develwoutacause’s Twitter Archive

11 results for constructors

1. develwoutacause’s Twitter Archive—№ 1,702

   reproducing outside of CE, but I can't manually invoke the constructor of a class. > class Foo { prop; } > Foo.apply({ prop: 'test' }); TypeError: Class constructor Foo cannot

2. develwoutacause’s Twitter Archive—№ 1,207

   @JemYoung Constructors should *never* have side effects or non-trivial computations. Constructors are for constructing, and assigning parameters to fields. If you want to do more, wrap it in a factory.

3. develwoutacause’s Twitter Archive—№ 1,640

   = document.createElement('foo-bar'); el.prop = 'test'; customElements.define('foo-bar', class extends HTMLElement { constructor() { super(); console.log(this.prop); // undefined } });

4. develwoutacause’s Twitter Archive—№ 436

   Particularly interested in abstract constructors as they relate to some upcoming content I'm excited to share... https://twitter.com/typescript/status/1349158343240163328. @typescript/1349158343240163328.

5. develwoutacause’s Twitter Archive—№ 445

   solution, but if you're using TypeScript, could you erase the constructor from the public type? I've used that trick to hide implementation details before. I think that would have some